Pages

Saturday, April 21, 2012

OBJECT LESSONS FROM CHEMISTRY: NARRATIVE STRATEGIES


Narrative strategies is an illustrative approach that provides Christian examples that can be linked to a particular topic under consideration.  The illustration might be a story from the Bible that highlights a particular point like stories of heroes and scientists from where we can derive lessons, and personal narratives or experiences that give a spiritual perspective.  Narratives can also be in a form of history or the development of a certain concept or understanding. 
In introducing the metric system to my students for instance, I try to tell them how the concept of standards evolved or came about.  I would narrate to them that, before standards were developed it was customary that the measurement of length was made by comparing an object or distance to some portion of the human anatomy.  Greeks used the foot, Romans used the pace; digits were used to measure relatively small things.  By the end of the 18th century, practically every country, province, and many smaller governmental units operated with its own system of weights and measures.[1]  The outcome was chaotic; and it created a serious problem for trade between countries.  The problem with the earlier units was that they were not standardized.  Whose foot is going to be used?  Mine or yours?  After this I would then continue to tell them the history of the development of the metric system.  Now they are settled and convinced that standards are important.  (Pause.)  Then I would add, “so standards are important!”  I could then give further evidences for that statement and then add, “God has standards for His people too—the 10 Commandments.”
In my chemistry classes I often mention the contributions of the founding fathers of science like Isaac Newton (when studying electromagnetic spectrum),  Robert Boyle (history of chemistry, gas laws, acids and bases), Joseph Henry (Henry’s law), James Joule (conservation of energy), and Lord Kelvin (temperature and second law of thermodynamics).  Citing even just a brief description of their contributions and their faith profession is especially important in our times today where atheism or the belief in evolution is the widely accepted worldview among many leading men of science.  Of course, there are still many scientists who believe in God and creation but whose contributions to science are not directly related to chemistry. 

CONCLUDING NOTES
I suppose that Big Banger scientists agreed with Hawking when he said that the LHC is crucial for our survival.  But they didn’t tell us exactly why.  Probably they are venturing the most ambitious project on the planet for it is crucial for the survival of science—the materialistic science—science without faith.  Perhaps they want to affirm their confidence in the science that they hold so dearly, the science that they claim can leap into waters where religion is afraid to wade.  Their science, they claim, respects more deeply the potential of humanity than religion ever can for while religion is encouraging awe in things unseen, science is elucidating them.[2]
The materialistic scientists are usually polemical, willing to take great risks, and always on the offensive side of the controversy in pushing for their products.  They seem to have a very noble project when they said it is “crucial for the survival of humanity.”  But my Bible tells me that it is not important at all.  Jesus said, “I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.”[3]  It is God’s purpose to bring salvation to everyone.  And the ultimate goal of all our activities in and inside our classrooms must be geared toward that end.  “For this is what the Lord has commanded us: ‘“I have made you a light . . . that you may bring salvation to the ends of the earth.”’[4]
If scientists are bold in their proclamations, we Christians must be bolder; for we have a nobler purpose.  And our success and failure along this line have eternal consequences.  They are probing deep to what is hidden; we are acting on what is plainly heard and seen.  Yes, there is no hiding about it.  God’s immutable qualities must be preached in our classes.  Our students must know.

Although the ideal faith integration must go beyond the confines of the classrooms—it must be the “Christianization of the entire school program”[5]—it is still the regular, visible teacher inside the classroom that is the major factor in the whole process of integration.  It is he who has the most telling influence upon his students.
            Can employing object lessons makes teaching a class truly Christian?  It certainly will if done with care and with God’s blessings.  Employing the techniques outlined in this paper is only part of the process of doing integration of faith and learning.  But this can be a good, if not an excellent, start.  If a teacher prepares his materials well, and study carefully in advance how he would deliver them with their corresponding faith integration, I believe that meaningful engagement will be experienced by both the teacher and the students.  Learning and faith will then flourish.



[1]       Lingren, Wesley E. 1986. Essentials of Chemistry.  New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.  p. 22.
[2]       See Peter W. Atkins’ essay entitled, The Limitless Power of Science in "Nature's Imagination", John Cornwell, ed.; 1995 Oxford University Press, p.125.
[3]      John 10:10.
[4]      Acts 13:47.
[5]      Knight, George R. 1985. Myths in Adventism. Washington: Review and Herald Publishing Association. p. 143.

No comments:

Post a Comment